Categories
BlogSchmog Creative Corner In the News Of Course

Write for Wired. (c’mon, everybody is doing it.)

I don’t know if my lame little change will make the final cut, but 15 minutes of my time — most of it getting a SocialText account — gives me a shot at being listed in Wired News. The two entities are teaming up to try their hand at communal writing, with the final version (barring disaster) running on September 7th.

The original version of the article, written by Wired’s Ryan Singel, was 1,059 words long. Hopefully, by the time the deadline hits, it won’t be 5,000 words and obsessed with the details of the many trivial-but-related topics in the

This bears watching for a few reasons. First, it is another chance to see wiki activity inspired by broadcast media. I don’t know how many print papers or television stations might give this project a little soapboax, but it definitely is circulating among blogs. Second, this is a very specific and short-duration project. According to evidence produced by Web Lab with their groundbreaking (but alas, little known) work with discussion forums, that short time commitment should increase the level of user interest and input into the project. Third, this is a battle of sorts between collaborative authorship and top-down editing. I’m almost positive that, good or bad, the comparison will be made between what the paid editors might have done with the original text and what the communal editors (like me) came up with.

By Kevin Makice

A Ph.D student in informatics at Indiana University, Kevin is rich in spirit. He wrestles and reads with his kids, does a hilarious Christian Slater imitation and lights up his wife's days. He thinks deeply about many things, including but not limited to basketball, politics, microblogging, parenting, online communities, complex systems and design theory. He didn't, however, think up this profile.

3 replies on “Write for Wired. (c’mon, everybody is doing it.)”

[…] Since it was timely, I added a reference to the Defra wiki experiment to Wired’s communal writing project*, since both are likely going to be put up as THE examples of failed wikis for the near future. […]

[…] For myself, I did my token edit early and then waited until the final day to come back for more. By the time I arrived, the rambling list of links that had been criticized a few days ago was lopped in two. Most of my changes were attempts to clean up the wording, adding a little content and making no real effort to remove the stiltedness of each section. The story was probably over-organized, and if I had to do it over again I would have boldly removed some of the sub-headings into just four sections: Intro, Wikis Good, Wikis Bad, Wiki Future. […]

[…] In doing to research on the Wired wiki article, I came across this fellow: A.J. Jacobs. Someone (a critic) once describe him as a “bag person’s Dave Barry” — to which he replied: “I am actually a bag person’s David Sedaris.” Mostly, he’s an author for Esquire et al who has some pretty remarkable ways of looking at society. […]

Comments are closed.